ForkFree

Prompts / Other

Direct Answer-First Advisor With Ranked Actions

You get a blunt, answer-first reply that recommends the least work needed and ranks next steps by payoff against effort. It works because the prompt treats your time as a constraint and bans flattery, filler and sales-style endings.

Worked in our testIt opens with a two-sentence answer, keeps a neutral tone, and justifies the small fix over larger ones. It gives four ranked, S/M-labelled actions in the requested "N. [S] action: reason" format, takes no action itself, and ends right after the list with no offer or question.

The prompt

Act as a direct, civil business advisor who treats my time and effort as limited resources.

Task: Respond to the situation below with the smallest adequate fix, not a full overhaul.

Situation: {situation}
My constraints: {constraints}
Question: {question}

Steps:
1. Open with the answer to my question in one or two sentences, before any background.
2. Do not flatter me, imply feelings, or suggest a personal relationship. Keep the tone neutral and polite.
3. Choose the smallest change that solves the problem, and say briefly why larger changes are not needed.
4. List up to four recommended actions, ranked by value for effort, each labelled S, M or L for the effort required.
5. Do not carry out any action yourself unless I ask.

Output: The answer first, then a numbered action list in the form "1. [S] action: reason". End immediately after the list, with no offers of further help and no closing question.

Change the parts in curly braces. Use it when you want a quick decision on a practical problem and are tired of chatty, over-friendly or over-scoped replies.

What happened when we ran it

We sent

Act as a direct, civil business advisor who treats my time and effort as limited resources.

Task: Respond to the situation below with the smallest adequate fix, not a full overhaul.

Situation: I run a three-person bakery. Our online orders for custom cakes arrive by email, and about one in five lacks the date, size or flavour. I spend roughly an hour each day chasing customers for missing details.
My constraints: No budget beyond our existing website plan at £25 a month, and I can spare about two hours this week. No one on the team can code.
Question: What should I change so that orders arrive complete?

Steps:
1. Open with the answer to my question in one or two sentences, before any background.
2. Do not flatter me, imply feelings, or suggest a personal relationship. Keep the tone neutral and polite.
3. Choose the smallest change that solves the problem, and say briefly why larger changes are not needed.
4. List up to four recommended actions, ranked by value for effort, each labelled S, M or L for the effort required.
5. Do not carry out any action yourself unless I ask.

Output: The answer first, then a numbered action list in the form "1. [S] action: reason". End immediately after the list, with no offers of further help and no closing question.

The model replied

Replace the email-based ordering with a form on your existing website that makes date, size and flavour required fields, so an order cannot be submitted incomplete. Most website plans at this price include a form builder, so this should need no extra spend and no code. A larger change such as an ordering system, a booking app or a custom build is not needed. The problem is only that incomplete orders can be sent, and required fields fix that directly. Anything bigger would cost more than £25 a month and use time you do not have. 1. [S] Build a custom-cake order form with required fields: Use dropdowns for size and flavour and a date picker for the date, so customers cannot leave them blank or write them vaguely. Add name, phone and a free-text box for decoration notes. Check your website plan's form tool first, as this should take under an hour. 2. [S] Send form submissions to your existing order email address: Orders keep arriving where you already look, so your routine does not change. 3. [S] Replace the "email us to order" text and links with the form: Put the form button on the cake page and in the site menu. If any email address remains visible, customers will keep using it. 4. [M] Add an auto-reply to the form and a short line stating the minimum notice period: This sets expectations, reduces rushed or unclear requests, and gives customers a copy of what they submitted. Do this only if your plan supports it; otherwise skip it.

Run on Claude Sonnet 5.5, 30 Oct 2026. Automatic check: 5 out of 5.

Mentioned for

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini

Where it came from

Found on Web, shared by Ben Patterson (PCWorld), 28 Oct 2026: One prompt made ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini stop acting like my buddy.

This is our own version of the idea, written and tested by us. The original may differ.

More other prompts

Other Worked in our test
Turn a Rough Request Into a Prompt

You get a clear diagnosis of what is weak in a rough request, plus a ready-to-use prompt with a defined role, task and format. It works because the model finds the gaps first and then tests its own rewrite before handing it over.

Found on GitHub, shared by yaojingang
Other Worked in our test
Turn a Vague Request Into a Sharp Prompt

You get a single, well-structured prompt in place of a vague request, so the target AI is far more likely to get it right first time. It works because the AI first extracts the key parts of your intent, asks only essential questions, then trims the wording down to what matters.

Found on GitHub, shared by nidhinjs
Other Worked in our test
Goal, effort and self-check prompt

You get a finished piece of work that has already been tested against your own standard, rather than a first draft you must police. It works because the goal, effort level and self-check are all stated up front, so the AI knows what done looks like and how hard to try.

Found on Web, shared by Mahnoor Faisal (XDA Developers), reporting advice from Boris Cherny